UK Government Misled Public When Scrapping Air Quality Regulations, Experts State

Air pollution has been a long-standing public health concern in the UK, with every major city exceeding the World Health Organisation’s recommended levels of one of the most dangerous air pollutants, PM2.5. Despite this, the UK government has recently come under fire for scrapping important environmental regulations to improve air quality, with experts stating that the public was misled.

The Revelations

A recent report published by The Guardian revealed that the government misled the public when it scrapped crucial regulations to reduce toxic air pollution. As revealed by the report, UK ministers ignored guidance from DEFRA officials in violation of the Retained EU Law Act.

The UK aimed to lower air pollution levels to meet EU air quality standards. By revoking regulations 9 and 10 of the National Emission Ceiling (NEC) regulations, the country will no longer be legally obligated to reduce five major air pollutants. Regulation 9 required creating a national air pollution control program (NAPCP) to meet emission reduction commitments. Moreover, Regulation 10 mandated public consultation for any changes to the NAPCP. However, these regulations were due to be terminated by December 31, 2023.

The government’s dismissal of concerns regarding revocation regulations has been met with scepticism. They argue that this measure alleviates administrative burdens and eliminates unnecessary duplication. In July 2023, Thérèse Coffey, the former environment secretary, assured the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) that environmental protection standards would not be compromised, and that expert guidance would inform decisions involving the environment. However, recent revelations have shown that ministers were aware of the falsity of these claims.

Experts have called out the government’s actions, stating that the scrapping of the regulations sends a negative message about the government’s commitment to public health and environmental protection. Additionally, environmental groups have warned that the decision to abandon the regulations could lead to thousands of premature deaths over the coming years.

Poor Air Quality Impact on Public Health

The impact of poor air quality on public health is well documented, with studies showing that it can lead to various respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses, including lung cancer, asthma, and stroke. The World Health Organisation estimates that around 7 million people die prematurely each year as a result of exposure to air pollution. Transportation is a significant contributor to air pollution, with the effects of diesel emissions on the environment directly impacting individual health. Numerous car manufacturers have been accused of utilising emissions-cheating devices in their cars, resulting in many consumers pursuing compensation through diesel emission claims.

The UK is one of the worst-affected countries in Europe regarding air pollution. In London, for example, air pollution levels are so high that they can cause the equivalent of smoking 154 cigarettes a year, according to data from HouseFresh. Furthermore, according to a report by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and of Paediatrics and Child Health, air pollution is responsible for around 40,000 premature deaths in the UK each year, as well as causing numerous other health problems.

Impact on Businesses

While the government’s decision to abandon the regulations has been criticised for its negative impact on public health, it has also been suggested that it may have negative consequences for businesses. Companies that continue to operate with high levels of air pollution risk reputational damage and may be subject to legal action if they do not comply with environmental regulations.

In addition, businesses operating in areas with poor air quality may struggle to attract and retain staff, particularly those most vulnerable to the health effects of air pollution. This could reduce productivity and increase staff turnover, harming business performance.

Considering these findings, environmental campaigners have accused the UK government of prioritising industry interests over public health. They argue that the decision to scrap air quality regulations was driven not by a concern for public health but by a desire to protect the profits of the automotive industry.

The Way Forward

Experts have called for more decisive action to address the UK’s air pollution crisis. They argue that this requires a multi-faceted approach. The ban on diesel and petrol cars will not come into effect until 2035, and even then, older vehicles will remain on the road. This means that in the meantime, CAZs are necessary to reduce air pollution.

Additionally, the experts have highlighted the importance of developing and enforcing stricter vehicle emissions standards. This would require the government to work closely to ensure they comply with the necessary regulations, hold automakers accountable for diesel claims, and impose penalties on those who fail to do so.

A more comprehensive approach is needed if the air pollution problem is to be addressed effectively. This will require a commitment from the UK government to prioritise public health over the interests of industry and to adopt a more proactive approach to reducing air pollution and protecting the health of the UK population.

Scroll to Top