Person Attempts to Blame Twin in Fatal Buggy Crash, Authorities Say Leifert & Leifert

A recent tragic accident involving an SUV and an Amish buggy resulted in the loss of two children’s lives and left others seriously injured. In the aftermath of the crash, court documents suggested that the driver involved may have attempted to pin the blame on their twin sibling, complicating the already heart-wrenching situation.

The Incident

The driver’s vehicle struck an Amish buggy on a rural road, causing a devastating scene. Witnesses reported seeing two individuals who looked alike but were dressed differently. One was in casual clothing, while the other wore a supermarket uniform. The driver, later identified by authorities, was allegedly involved in the crash.

Substance Use a Factor

At the time of the accident, the driver was under the influence of methamphetamines, a fact they admitted during an emotional call. With a history of prior convictions for driving under the influence and providing false information to law enforcement, the individual panicked. In a desperate attempt to avoid severe legal consequences, they reportedly implicated their twin sibling, hoping that their physical resemblance might delay an arrest and soften the repercussions of their past offenses.

“Driving under the influence, particularly with prior offenses, can lead to severe criminal penalties, including vehicular homicide charges. The courts take such cases very seriously, especially when there are fatalities,” says West Palm Beach criminal lawyer Douglas I. Leifert.

The Recorded Conversation

In a dramatic turn of events, a sheriff’s deputy accidentally left a recording device active during an interrogation. The recording captured a whispered conversation between the two siblings, with one suggesting that law enforcement might be suspicious of their story. This recorded exchange became key evidence, unraveling the fabricated account and shedding light on the driver’s attempt to manipulate the situation.

Recording Laws

Under certain circumstances, law enforcement may record conversations without consent during investigations, depending on state laws. Florida, for instance, has a two-party consent law that generally requires all parties in a conversation to agree to being recorded. However, exceptions exist for law enforcement when criminal activity is suspected, which allows officers to use recorded evidence in certain investigations.

Criminal Charges

The driver now faces multiple charges, including criminal vehicular homicide and driving under the influence. Evidence against them includes witness testimonies, search history following the crash, and phone calls made shortly after the accident, where the driver allegedly admitted responsibility. These factors will likely play a significant role in the legal proceedings ahead.

Media Information:

Leifert & Leifert

1200 S Pine Island Rd
#220
Plantation, FL 33324

(954) 424-7433

Scroll to Top